L.10.2 — Lyles
I don’t really believe that there’s a curse on my music, but I do.
The universe conspires so that something happens to prevent any piece of mine from actually being performed. If a piece is performed, something happens to make it flawed.
I am not counting the two or three times we’ve sung through William Blake’s Inn, although I appreciate the bravery of my friends in courting disaster. And “Sonnet 18” had a touching premiere in VSU’s Rotunda back in 2005.
But on the whole…
It began with “Children of the Heavenly Father,” a piece I wrote at Ginny’s behest for the Newnan Presbyterian Choir (years before I was its choir director.) It was her favorite hymn, she said, an old Swedish folktune. So I set it for SAB chorus and piano.
On the Sunday morning, I went to hear my piece. First, the preacher forgot it, leaping to his feet after the scripture reading and launching straight into his sermon. I think he must have realized, as he scanned over the congregation and saw me there, out of place, that he had done so. The choir bravely set to it after the offertory.
But then the accompanist/director played it on the organ, effectively destroying the nature of the piece with its sustained arpeggios, and, because she was struggling with a piano piece on the organ while trying to conduct at the same time, blew some entrances and the whole thing fell apart.
And finally, after the service was over, several kindly souls told me they liked the piece; had I written the melody? Puzzled, I turned to the hymnal—and “Children of the Heavenly Father” was nowhere to be found. It was Ginny’s favorite hymn at Mary Baldwin College. Presbyterians had never heard it.
Longtime readers of this blog will already be familiar with the Symphony in G major debacle: in the summer of 2007, after I wrote Dance for Double Bass Duo and Marimba (which went off without a hitch, because the universe does not care about double bass music), and after the orchestra read through (terribly and sloppily) “Blake Leads a Walk on the Milky Way,” my good friend Stephen Czarkowski asked me to write a symphony for the GHP orchestra. I had finished a movement and a half when he decided in April of 2008 not to return to GHP. It threw me for such a loop that I am just now getting back into the composing groove.
More recently we have the Chinese youth orchestra who agreed—bravely and foolishly—to premiere “Milky Way” on their U.S. tour. I knew they would not; they are a traditional instrument orchestra and in no way could tackle the lush Western chromaticism of that piece. But they tried before apologetically giving up. It was too late, though: swine flu erupted in their province and the Chinese government forbade them to travel.
I submitted “Sir Christémas” to Masterworks last year, and Kathy Bizarth liked it. She said she would like to schedule it for the Christmas (i.e., 2009) concert. What happened? She retired not only from Masterworks but from teaching itself.
And now this: when it looks as if I might even complete a pretty good chamber piece, I get thrown off course for 24 hours while I have to loll about a hospital bed waiting for tests for nonexistent heart issues.
It gives me pause about wanting to win any of these competitions. What danger am I putting the Yale Glee Club or the Meistersingers into? And the poor Ayrshire Fiddle Orchestra next summer—should I warn them that performance of my music puts their whole tour at risk?
It’s enough to give one heart palpitations.
Protected: L.10.3—Lyles
Assignment L.10.3
Assignment L.10.2: Impossible belief
From the quote rotator:
I said to myself: I cannot possibly believe that, and as I was saying it I noticed I had already believed it a second time. —GCL, G.9
The assignment is to write a short disquisition on something you find you cannot possibly believe, yet do. (Remember to tag your post with the assignment tag!)
A rebuke from the universe (again with this)
The American Composers Forum has been sending out an email to this guy’s blog, in which he has challenged himself to write a new piece every day for the month of February. I know, it’s cheating to use the shortest month, right?
I’ve enjoyed the little works so far, and of course it’s fun to hear another composer whine about getting it done.
It almost makes me ready to rev the 24 Hour Challenge back up. Almost.
What do you think: is there a value in self challenges like this? Or is it just a stunt to exercise your chops?
What is art? (Again, with this.)
All right, no one has posted anything here for a while, so I have something that may be a conversation starter. Maybe not. Just something I ran across.
Those who follow my blog know that I am learning to play the guitar. As I am learning to play, I am also reading Johnny Cash’s autobiography. He’s my favorite singer, and “Folsom Prison Blues” is the first song I’ve learned to play. In the book there is a paragraph that struck me as particularly interesting:
“I was talking with a friend of mine about this the other day: that country life as I knew it might be a thing of the past and when music people today, performers and fans alike, talk about being “country”…they’re talking more about choices–a way to look, a group to belong to, a kind of music to call their own. Which begs the question: Is there anything behind the symbols of modern “country,” or are the symbols themselves the whole story? …Back in Arkansas, a way of life produced a certain kind of music. Does a certain kind of music now produce a way of life?”
Something about that passage really resonated with me, because I think you could replace the word “country” with any number of art forms: screenwriting, musical theatre, painting. Or even just art in general. It seems to me that a lot of modern art, especially commercial art, stems from the artist’s desire to be seen as an artist and not a need to be an artist. “I want to live the lifestyle that goes along with being a rap star, therefore I should break into the rap industry.”
“I would like people to dote on me at gallery openings, therefore I paint.”
Maybe this is nothing new. Perhaps these people have been around since the beginning of art. Certainly seems more prevalent now. Discuss.
Is it art if it isn’t driven by the artistic impulse?
Is this a bad thing? Does using art a simply a means to an end cheapen it for those for whom art is the end itself?
If there is another discussion in there, I’d like to hear that too.
L.10.1 – Turff
Repeating my first submission, from the comment within Dale’s post:
Brine
Spry
Sigh
Fear
Oomph
Sex
Seeping
Clocked
Annoying
Sane
And my second one, which I’ve been holding back to work on a bit:
Who flows,
knows,
phases,
cuts through…
sinks through.
Stays.
Settles.
Soaks through…
…new waves
dies.
Funt L.10.1
Honk
Moo
Squeak
Roar
Quack
Hiss
Bellow
Bleat
Neigh
Chirp
Assignment
Um
Er
Ah
Wait
Don’t
Sex
Sextet
Oats
None
Damn