Probably not this. Requiescat in pace.
But definitely this:
And definitely I’m voting yes on this.
But what about this:
What with my reading of Opening to Inner Light and other tasty books, I know we’re heading towards a fireside discussion more meaty than we’ve had in a while, but I think this bit may not be able to wait.C4090-456
Yesterday, as I mindlessly surfed the intertubes, I came across this site: ugliesttattoos.com. It is OMG•NSFW, so I’ll provide a couple of samples here and links to particularly egregious examples. [NSFW!!!]
Those should suffice. The entire website is jawdroppingly, gobsmackingly, entirely like these samples. Only much, much worse. Much, much, much worse.
I like tattoos. I have a couple myself and wouldn’t mind one more, if I were allowed. And I find them to be fascinating body modifications on others in most circumstances. But honest to God, I came across very few tattoos on this site that I was able think, “Wow, that’s cool/beautiful/transgressive/sexy.â€Â They were all grotesque. (I did like this one. [SFW, if weird])
So in our neverending discussion of “What is art?â€, I’d like to ask in the immortal acronym embodied above, “WTF?â€Â How are we to fit these manifestations of our creative imperative into the schema of that imperative? (I’ve tagged this with the Corroborative Evidence category; is that where we are with this?)C4090-455
Discuss.
Oh my. This is the greatest piece of corroborative evidence I have come across this year.
Discuss.
We couldn’t really consign this to the flames, but it is nonetheless a powerful reminder of the just nature of our creed.